Two Brains Are Better Than One

A review of Iain McGilchrist’s documentary The Divided Brain published in Resurgence & Ecologist magazine, January/February 2020 issue, by Nat Dyer

Best-selling author and psychiatrist Iain McGilchrist says that we each have two brains, not one, and that the future of civilisation hangs on the relationship between them. Each brain – what we normally think of as the left and right hemispheres – can operate independently and sees a radically different version of the world. The extent to which we rely on one or the other shapes civilisation. Across many different areas of society, he argues, the west has lost the broader vision of what humans are and how they relate to the rest of life, in favour of a narrow, machine-like view.

McGilchrist first put this thesis forward in a 400-page book, The Master and His Emissary, which took him 20 years to write. It went on to sell over 100,000 copies. Now, 10 years later, a well-crafted documentary, The Divided Brain, follows McGilchrist as he meets supporters and critics of his ideas. The result is a fascinating ode to the power of art, Nature, and holistic thinking based on the latest neuroscience. The softly spoken McGilchrist, who taught English at Oxford before retraining to become a psychiatrist, is often pictured on camera walking on the coastal hills near his home on the Isle of Skye. He talks viewers through experiments showing that the difference between the hemispheres, contrary to popular belief, is not what they do, but how they do it.

The Divided Brain – Trailer

The left hemisphere – the ‘emissary’ in his metaphor – divides and conquers the world with sharply focused precision, but neglects context. It has overthrown the right hemisphere – the rightful master – which deals in meaning and the big picture. As a result, the west is an enormously powerful and wealthy civilisation that fails to understand how it fits into the whole.

The Divided Brain grounds these lofty ideas in the personal stories of people who, due to tumours or strokes, have damaged parts of their brains, and those of the doctors who treat them. Alongside the scientists, it features interviews with actor John Cleese, a fan of the book, as well as former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and Leroy Little Bear, an Indigenous leader from Canada.

McGilchrist’s ideas remain controversial to some scientists who prefer to see the brain as a computer, but to its credit the documentary includes some of this criticism. The power of the two-brain idea – whether it turns out to be scientific truth or metaphor – is that it gives a language and an easy-to-grasp image to something many people understand intuitively. Although the film doesn’t have all the answers, it throws new light on some of the biggest questions of our time. Why does the education system steer children towards increasingly specialised knowledge and undervalue drama and art? Why are many economists so focused on abstract mathematical models that ignore reality? And why don’t more people recognise that humans are entirely dependent on the climate and the rest of life for survival?

McGilchrist is keen to stress that he is not anti-science and would like to see a balance between the right and left hemi­spheres. The task he sets us is nothing less than a fundamental shift in how we conceive of human beings and the world and our relationship with it. The alternative, he suggests, is the collapse of civilisation. But it’s not all bleak. Making an analogy with people who through rehabilitation recover after strokes, he says that western civilisation can do the same, if only it recognises the need and moves in the right direction.

The Divided Brain. Directed by Manfred Becker. Matter of Fact Media, 2019. vimeo.com/ondemand/thedividedbrain

Nat Dyer Written by:

4 Comments

  1. March 23, 2020
    Reply

    From an amazon review:

    I find it hard to believe all the glowing reviews. I quote from Professor A.C. Grayling (on another website):

    “The fact is that the findings of brain science are nowhere near fine-grained enough yet to support the large psychological and cultural conclusions Iain McGilchrist draws from them. Absorbing and fascinating though the book is, it does not persuade one that returning our Western civilisation to the government of such supposed right-hemisphere possessions as religion and instinct would be anywhere near a good thing.”

    and from Professor Owen Flanagan:

    “The first 200-odd pages of the book are devoted to an idiosyncratic survey of the literature on hemispheric differences ….
    This is where the apocalyptic warnings and dim hopefulness of the book’s second half, a 250-page romp through western history ….

    The fact is, hemispheric differences are not well understood. Neither are patterns over 2500 years of western history. Trying to explain the ill-understood latter with a caricature of the former does little to illuminate either.”

    • Nat Dyer
      March 23, 2020
      Reply

      Thanks Ed. I’m not sure if this was your Amazon review or someone else’s. To be honest, I found the book heavy going – but the documentary really spoke to me. And from the research that I’ve done on abstract modelling in economics, he has an important lesson about the need to balance clear focus with the bigger picture.

  2. March 24, 2020
    Reply

    Sorry, no, that wasn’t my own Amazon review. It just captured my initial reactions to the book perfectly based on the debunking I’ve read of “The Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind” and all the research that has gone on with split brain patients. (I happen to have a friend who has a child born without a corpus callosum. Her teenage functioning is far beyond what doctors initially thought was going to be possible.) I have no doubt that historical notions of the split can be a useful metaphor to learn from, but if he’s trying that hard to present the metaphor as real (when it’s not), then I’m going to be suspicious of the value of his lessons. I’ll give the movie a shot though. That’s a much smaller investment of time than his book. I just wanted to clear up my comment first.

    • Nat Dyer
      March 26, 2020
      Reply

      Thanks Ed. I’ve just googled ‘Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind’ – hadn’t heard of it before. From what I understand about McGilchrist he argues that both sides of the brain do both things – ie. language is both left and right, logic is both left and right etc. – but he says the difference is the type of attention each gives. And that the corpus callosum’s role is something separating the two rather than bringing them together. If you want to invest even less time (and no money) you could check out his RSA animates lecture which is here: https://www.thersa.org/discover/videos/rsa-animate/2011/10/rsa-animate—the-divided-brain. If you do watch the film, I’d be interested in your thoughts. Cheers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *